×

We use cookies to help make LingQ better. By visiting the site, you agree to our cookie policy.

image

It`s Okay To Be Smart, Why Do More Species Live Near the Equator?

Why Do More Species Live Near the Equator?

[MUSIC]

"This episode is supported by Prudential"

Here in Tambopata Peru, EO Wilson once found more species of ant in a single tree than

there are in all of the British Isles.

Scientists have seen this pattern all over the world.

More species exist near the tropics.

Why is that?

[MUSIC]

In one night here in the Peruvian rainforest, I saw more insects in an hour than I've seen

in my entire life, total.

It's not just insects.

Birds, mammals, plants… tropical rainforests are some of the most biodiverse places on

Earth.

It's not just the abundance of it, it's how many different species we find in a given

area.

But why is that?

It might seem obvious, or even like a silly question, but the more you think about it,

the weirder it gets, because life has shown it can succeed pretty much anywhere, from

the top of the highest mountains to the bottom of the ocean . But Earth's most biodiverse places

are always regions like this, tropical rainforests.

One reason why is maps lie to us.

Rectangular projections are distortions of a sphere that make the poles look bigger and

tropics look smaller than they really are.

When in reality, the tropics contain about 40% of area on Earth.

Unsurprisingly, larger areas usually have more species.

In less than half a square kilometer in the Amazon, we can find as many tree species as

we find in four million square kilometers of temperate forest.

Species here are at a higher density.

There must be something special about tropical ecosystems.

Climate is one factor.

When we look at plant fossils and where they are found in different times in Earth's

natural climate history, tropical forests are older than temperate forests, they've

had more time to become rich.

But while tropical regions avoided the last ice age and don't have cold winters, it's

not EASY to survive here.

There are dry and wet seasons, there's competition for resources, no matter what kind of organism

you are, there's a lot of stuff that wants to eat you.

On average the tropics are warm and they get plenty of water.

This part of the planet gets more average solar radiation throughout the year.

Which means that plants and the animals they support get more energy,

they are more productive.

But this still only explains why there's *more* life, not why so many *different* kinds of

life.

If you've got a pie, more people can get a

slice if you cut it up into a thousand tiny ones vs just a few.

We call these slices niches, the habitat and conditions that one organism needs to flourish,

and here in the rainforest, there's a lot of slices.

Organisms that live at higher latitudes have to be more adaptable,

be able to handle lots of different conditions.

One week it might be snowing.

The next, flowers and fish are everywhere.

Specialization is too risky, you've gotta be adaptable.

Life is more stable in the tropics.

One thing I noticed here in Peru is the sun sets a lot earlier here this time of year

than what I'm used to back at home.

Here near the equator there's essentially the same number of hours in day and night no matter what month it is.

Let's say you're a bird that eats insects, and maybe these bats over here

You've got the same number of hours to do your feeding. The birds get the day shift, the bats get the night shift.

You get to split that niche evenly. That wouldn't work at higher latitudes and more temperate climates.

There's simply just too much change, too much disruption for these species to keep track of.

And this might explain a reason why more species coexist near the equator.

The tropics are crowded, so the competition for resources is extreme.

That competition drives organisms to specialize, like how we see ants or caterpillars that

might be able to live on just one single type of plant.

But because climate and seasons are more stable, that specialization isn't as risky.

More species, less area.

These theories are really good at explaining

why there's so many species in the rainforest NOW, but we're still missing the beginning

of our story, where those species came from.

It's possible that evolution is actually working on overdrive here near the equator, speciation,

the creation of new species by various natural forces, actually happens FASTER near the equator.

Each generation of living things gathers changes, mutations, some are good,

some are bad, some are neither, but it isn't until those changes are passed on to the next generation

that natural selection and time can do their thing .

The reason that bacteria are so good at adapting is because they reproduce quickly, they have more generations

in less time.

The same thing happens here in the rainforest. Plants and animals

grow up faster, they can have more generations.

This drives competition, this is what forces plants and animals to specialize

in all of the amazing ways that we've seen.

This theory, that evolution happens faster near the equator, finally ties together the

ideas of time, area, and energy to explain the origin of biodiversity.

There's an idea that says the tropics are

so well suited to the creation of new species…that it's like an engine for biodiversity

Another idea says the tropics are so rich

and productive, and the climate's so stable, that things don't go extinct as fast.

More species are born here and species live longer here, the tropics are both a cradle

AND a museum.

Scientists even think that over many many years, species from places like this

go and seed biodiversity throughout the rest of the world.

This is why it's so important to protect the rainforest, to preserve life's cradle

and museum.

To keep it from being cut up, because more area

means more species.

To keep the climate from changing, to keep life here stable and rich.

Chemists know all the elements on the periodic

table.

Physicists probably know all the subatomic particles that make up matter.

But biology still hasn't answered one of its most basic questions: how much life IS

there?

EO Wilson once wrote that "unlike the rest of science, the study of biodiversity has

a time limit".

If species begin to go extinct faster than we can describe them, the we might never

know how much life Earth has to offer.

And now that I've seen something like THIS, I don't want to see that happen.

Stay curious.

Learn languages from TV shows, movies, news, articles and more! Try LingQ for FREE

Why Do More Species Live Near the Equator? Warum leben mehr Tierarten in der Nähe des Äquators? Why Do More Species Live Near the Equator? ¿Por qué viven más especies cerca del Ecuador? Pourquoi davantage d'espèces vivent-elles près de l'équateur ? Perché più specie vivono vicino all'equatore? なぜ赤道付近に生息する種が多いのか? 적도 근처에 더 많은 종이 사는 이유는 무엇인가요? Waarom leven er meer soorten in de buurt van de evenaar? Dlaczego więcej gatunków żyje w pobliżu równika? Porque é que há mais espécies a viver perto do Equador? Почему больше видов обитает вблизи экватора? Neden Ekvatora Yakın Yerlerde Daha Fazla Tür Yaşıyor? Чому більше видів живе поблизу екватора? 为什么更多的物种生活在赤道附近? 為什麼更多的物種生活在赤道附近?

[MUSIC]

"This episode is supported by Prudential" |||sponsored by||Prudential |||||Пруденшл

Here in Tambopata Peru, EO Wilson once found more species of ant in a single tree than ||Тамбо́пата||Е.О. Вілсон|||||||||||| Hier in Tambopata Peru vond EO Wilson ooit meer soorten mieren in een enkele boom dan...

there are in all of the British Isles. |||||||Британські острови

Scientists have seen this pattern all over the world.

More species exist near the tropics.

Why is that?

[MUSIC]

In one night here in the Peruvian rainforest, I saw more insects in an hour than I've seen In one night here in the Peruvian rainforest, I saw more insects in an hour than I've seen

in my entire life, total.

It's not just insects.

Birds, mammals, plants… tropical rainforests are some of the most biodiverse places on ||||||||||rich in species|| Птахи||||тропічні ліси||||||біорізноманітні||

Earth.

It's not just the abundance of it, it's how many different species we find in a given ||||variety||||||||||||

area.

But why is that?

It might seem obvious, or even like a silly question, but the more you think about it,

the weirder it gets, because life has shown it can succeed pretty much anywhere, from

the top of the highest mountains to the bottom of the ocean . But Earth's most biodiverse places

are always regions like this, tropical rainforests.

One reason why is maps lie to us.

Rectangular projections are distortions of a sphere that make the poles look bigger and ||||||||||полюса||| Прямокутні|проєкції||спотворення||||||||||

tropics look smaller than they really are.

When in reality, the tropics contain about 40% of area on Earth.

Unsurprisingly, larger areas usually have more species.

In less than half a square kilometer in the Amazon, we can find as many tree species as

we find in four million square kilometers of temperate forest. ||||||||temperate| ||||||||помірний|

Species here are at a higher density. ||||||population density

There must be something special about tropical ecosystems.

Climate is one factor.

When we look at plant fossils and where they are found in different times in Earth's

natural climate history, tropical forests are older than temperate forests, they've

had more time to become rich.

But while tropical regions avoided the last ice age and don't have cold winters, it's

not EASY to survive here.

There are dry and wet seasons, there's competition for resources, no matter what kind of organism ||||||||||regardless of|regardless of||||

you are, there's a lot of stuff that wants to eat you. ||||||creatures|||||

On average the tropics are warm and they get plenty of water.

This part of the planet gets more average solar radiation throughout the year.

Which means that plants and the animals they support get more energy,

they are more productive.

But this still only explains why there's *more* life, not why so many *different* kinds of

life.

If you've got a pie, more people can get a

slice if you cut it up into a thousand tiny ones vs just a few.

We call these slices niches, the habitat and conditions that one organism needs to flourish, ||||niches||environment|||||||| ||||ніші|||||||||| We noemen deze plakjes niches, de habitat en omstandigheden die een organisme nodig heeft om te gedijen,

and here in the rainforest, there's a lot of slices.

Organisms that live at higher latitudes have to be more adaptable, |||||latitudes|||||

be able to handle lots of different conditions.

One week it might be snowing. |||||може йти сніг

The next, flowers and fish are everywhere.

Specialization is too risky, you've gotta be adaptable. Спеціалізація|||||||

Life is more stable in the tropics.

One thing I noticed here in Peru is the sun sets a lot earlier here this time of year

than what I'm used to back at home.

Here near the equator there's essentially the same number of hours in day and night no matter what month it is.

Let's say you're a bird that eats insects, and maybe these bats over here

You've got the same number of hours to do your feeding. The birds get the day shift, the bats get the night shift.

You get to split that niche evenly. That wouldn't work at higher latitudes and more temperate climates. ||||||||||||geographical regions||||

There's simply just too much change, too much disruption for these species to keep track of. Er is gewoon te veel verandering, te veel verstoring voor deze soorten om bij te houden.

And this might explain a reason why more species coexist near the equator. |||||||||live together||| |||||||||співіснують|||

The tropics are crowded, so the competition for resources is extreme.

That competition drives organisms to specialize, like how we see ants or caterpillars that

might be able to live on just one single type of plant.

But because climate and seasons are more stable, that specialization isn't as risky.

More species, less area.

These theories are really good at explaining

why there's so many species in the rainforest NOW, but we're still missing the beginning

of our story, where those species came from.

It's possible that evolution is actually working on overdrive here near the equator, speciation, ||||||||overdrive|||||species formation ||||||||на повну потужність|||||видоутворення

the creation of new species by various natural forces, actually happens FASTER near the equator.

Each generation of living things gathers changes, mutations, some are good, |||||збирає|||||

some are bad, some are neither, but it isn't until those changes are passed on to the next generation

that natural selection and time can do their thing .

The reason that bacteria are so good at adapting is because they reproduce quickly, they have more generations

in less time.

The same thing happens here in the rainforest. Plants and animals

grow up faster, they can have more generations.

This drives competition, this is what forces plants and animals to specialize

in all of the amazing ways that we've seen.

This theory, that evolution happens faster near the equator, finally ties together the

ideas of time, area, and energy to explain the origin of biodiversity.

There's an idea that says the tropics are

so well suited to the creation of new species…that it's like an engine for biodiversity

Another idea says the tropics are so rich

and productive, and the climate's so stable, that things don't go extinct as fast. ||||клімату|||||||||

More species are born here and species live longer here, the tropics are both a cradle

AND a museum.

Scientists even think that over many many years, species from places like this

go and seed biodiversity throughout the rest of the world.

This is why it's so important to protect the rainforest, to preserve life's cradle |||||||||||||origin |||||||||||зберегти||

and museum.

To keep it from being cut up, because more area

means more species.

To keep the climate from changing, to keep life here stable and rich.

Chemists know all the elements on the periodic Хіміки|||||||

table.

Physicists probably know all the subatomic particles that make up matter. Фізики|||||субатомні|||||

But biology still hasn't answered one of its most basic questions: how much life IS

there?

EO Wilson once wrote that "unlike the rest of science, the study of biodiversity has

a time limit".

If species begin to go extinct faster than we can describe them, the we might never ||||||||||||||may never|

know how much life Earth has to offer.

And now that I've seen something like THIS, I don't want to see that happen.

Stay curious.