×

We use cookies to help make LingQ better. By visiting the site, you agree to our cookie policy.

image

BBC - 6 Minute English (YouTube), The circular economy: 6 Minute English - YouTube

The circular economy: 6 Minute English - YouTube

Hello. This is 6 Minute English with me, Neil.

And me, Sam.

Today, we're talking rubbish.

Ooh, that's a bit harsh – I thought it

was going to be interesting.

I mean our topic is about rubbish, not that

we are rubbish.

I see. Do go on.

Thank you. So the amount of waste we produce

around the world is huge and it's a

growing problem.

But, there are some things that we can do,

like recycling. Where I live, I can recycle

a lot, and I'm always very careful to separate

- to split my rubbish into paper, metal,

food, plastic and so on.

But is that enough, even if we all do it?

We'll look a little more at this topic shortly,

but first, as always, a question. Which

country recycles the highest percentage

of its waste? Is it:

A: Sweden, B: Germany, or C: New Zealand

What do you think, Sam?

I'm not sure, but I think it could be Germany

so I'm going to go with that - Germany.

OK. We'll see if you're right a little

later on. The BBC radio programme,

Business Daily, recently tackled this topic.

They spoke to Alexandre Lemille, an

expert in this area. Does he think

recycling is the answer? Let's

hear what he said.

Recycling is not the answer to waste from

an efficient point of view because we are

not able to get all the waste separated

properly and therefore treated in the

background. The main objective of our

model is to hide waste

so we don't see as urban citizens, or rural

citizens, we don't see the waste, it is

out of sight and therefore out of mind.

What's his view of recycling?

I was a bit surprised, because he said

recycling wasn't the answer. One reason

is that it's not always possible to separate

waste you can recycle from waste you

can't recycle, and that makes treating it

very difficult.

'Treating' means handling it and using

different processes, so it can be used again.

And the result is a lot of waste, including

waste that could be recycled but which is

just hidden. And as long as we don't see

it, we don't think about it.

And he uses a good phrase to describe

this – out of sight, out of mind. And that's

true, at least for me. My rubbish and

recycling is collected and I don't really

think about what happens to it after that.

Is as much of it recycled as I think, or is it

buried, burned or even sent to other

countries? It's not in front of my house, so

I don't really think about it – out of sight,

out of mind.

Let's listen again

Recycling is not the answer to waste from

an efficient point of view because we are

not able to get all the waste separated

properly and therefore treated in the

background. The main objective of our

model is to hide waste so we don't see as

urban citizens, or rural citizens, we don't

see the waste, it is out of sight and

therefore out of mind.

One possible solution to this problem is

to develop what is called a circular economy.

Here's the presenter of Business Daily,

Manuela Saragosa, explaining what that means.

The idea then at the core of a circular

economic and business model is that a

product, like say a washing machine or

even a broom, can always be returned to

the manufacturer to be reused or repaired

before then sold on again. The point is

the manufacturer retains responsibility for

the lifecycle of the product

it produces rather than the consumer

assuming that responsibility when he or

she buys it.

So it seems like a simple idea – though

maybe very difficult to do.

Yes, the idea is that the company that

makes a product, the manufacturer, is

responsible for the product, not the

person who bought it, the consumer.

So, if the product breaks or reaches the

end of its useful life, its lifecycle, then the

manufacturer has to take it back and fix,

refurbish or have it recycled.

I guess this would make manufacturers

try to make their products last longer!

It certainly would. Let's listen again.

The idea then at the core of a circular

economic and business model is that a

product, like say a washing machine or

even a broom, can always be returned to

the manufacturer to be reused or repaired

before then sold on again. The point is

the manufacturer retains responsibility for

the lifecycle of the product it produces

rather than the consumer assuming

that responsibility when he or she buys it.

That's just about all we have time for in

this programme. Before we recycle the

vocabulary…

Oh very good Neil!

Before we - thank you Sam - before we recycle

the vocabulary, we need to get the answer

to today's question. Which country recycles

the highest percentage of its waste? Is it:

A: Sweden, B: Germany or C: New Zealand

Sam, what did you say?

I think it's Germany.

Well I would like to offer you congratulations

because Germany is the correct answer.

Now let's go over the vocabulary.

Of course. 'To separate' means to divide or

split different things, for example,

separate your plastic from your paper for

recycling.

'Treating' is the word for dealing with, for

example, recycled waste.

The phrase 'out of sight, out of mind',

means ignoring something or a situation

you can't see.

A 'manufacturer' is the person or company

that makes something and the consumer

is the person who buys that thing.

And the length of time you can expect a

product to work for is known as its 'lifecycle'.

Well the lifecycle of this programme is 6

minutes, and as we are there, or thereabouts,

it's time for us to head off. Thanks for

your company and hope you can join us

again soon. Until then, there is plenty

more to enjoy from BBC Learning English

online, on social media and on our app.

Bye for now.

Bye!

Learn languages from TV shows, movies, news, articles and more! Try LingQ for FREE

The circular economy: 6 Minute English - YouTube |circular|||| |מעגלית|||| Oběhové hospodářství: 6 minut angličtiny - YouTube Die Kreislaufwirtschaft: 6 Minuten Englisch - YouTube 循環型経済:6分間英語 - YouTube 순환 경제: 6분 영어 - YouTube Gospodarka o obiegu zamkniętym: 6 minut po angielsku - YouTube A economia circular: 6 Minute English - YouTube Циркулярная экономика: 6 Minute English - YouTube Циркулярна економіка: 6 хвилин англійською - YouTube 循环经济:6 分钟英语 - YouTube 循環經濟:6 分鐘英語 - YouTube

Hello. This is 6 Minute English with me, Neil.

And me, Sam. ||שָׁמו

Today, we're talking rubbish. |||שטויות Сьогодні ми говоримо нісенітниці.

Ooh, that's a bit harsh – I thought it ||||hart||| ||||cruel||| Ой, це трохи жорстоко – я так подумав

was going to be interesting. мало бути цікаво.

I mean our topic is about rubbish, not that Я маю на увазі, що наша тема про сміття, а не про це

we are rubbish. ми сміття.

I see. Do go on. Розумію. Продовжуйте.

Thank you. So the amount of waste we produce Дякую тобі. Отже, кількість відходів, які ми виробляємо

around the world is huge and it's a навколо світу величезний і це a

growing problem. зростаюча проблема.

But, there are some things that we can do, Але є деякі речі, які ми можемо зробити,

like recycling. Where I live, I can recycle як переробка. Там, де я живу, я можу переробляти

a lot, and I'm always very careful to separate багато, і я завжди дуже обережно відокремлюю

- to split my rubbish into paper, metal, - розділити моє сміття на папір, метал,

food, plastic and so on.

But is that enough, even if we all do it? Але чи достатньо цього, навіть якщо ми всі це робимо?

We'll look a little more at this topic shortly, Незабаром ми розглянемо цю тему трохи більше,

but first, as always, a question. Which

country recycles the highest percentage |recycelt||| країна переробляє найбільший відсоток

of its waste? Is it:

A: Sweden, B: Germany, or C: New Zealand

What do you think, Sam?

I'm not sure, but I think it could be Germany Я не впевнений, але думаю, що це може бути Німеччина

so I'm going to go with that - Germany.

OK. We'll see if you're right a little

later on. The BBC radio programme,

Business Daily, recently tackled this topic. |||behandelt|| |||addressed|| |||דנה בנושא||

They spoke to Alexandre Lemille, an ||||Lemille(1)| |||אלכסנדר למ|למיל| Вони розмовляли з Александром Лемілем, ан

expert in this area. Does he think фахівець у цій галузі. Чи думає він

recycling is the answer? Let's переробка - це відповідь? Давайте

hear what he said.

Recycling is not the answer to waste from ||||||Abfall| Recyklace není řešením problému s odpadem z Переробка - це не відповідь на проблему відходів

an efficient point of view because we are |effective|||||| z efektivního hlediska, protože jsme ефективна точка зору, тому що ми

not able to get all the waste separated не в змозі розділити всі відходи

properly and therefore treated in the correctly||||| správně, a proto se s nimi zachází v належним чином і тому лікуються в

background. The main objective of our |||מטרה|| zázemí. Hlavním cílem našeho тло. Основна мета нашого

model is to hide waste Модель полягає в тому, щоб приховати відходи

so we don't see as urban citizens, or rural takže nevidíme jako občané měst nebo venkova тому ми не бачимо ні міських, ні сільських жителів

citizens, we don't see the waste, it is občané, nevidíme odpad, je to громадяни, ми не бачимо відходів, вони є

out of sight and therefore out of mind. z dohledu, a proto i z mysli. з поля зору, а отже, з пам’яті.

What's his view of recycling? Яке його бачення переробки?

I was a bit surprised, because he said Я був трохи здивований, тому що він сказав

recycling wasn't the answer. One reason

is that it's not always possible to separate полягає в тому, що не завжди можливо розлучитися

waste you can recycle from waste you

can't recycle, and that makes treating it nelze recyklovat, a proto je jeho zpracování не можна переробляти, і це вимагає лікування

very difficult.

'Treating' means handling it and using Behandlung||||| Handling||||| "Ošetření" znamená manipulaci a použití «Лікувати» означає обробку та використання

different processes, so it can be used again. různé procesy, takže je lze znovu použít. різні процеси, тому його можна використовувати знову.

And the result is a lot of waste, including А в результаті виходить багато відходів, в т.ч

waste that could be recycled but which is відходи, які можна переробити, але які є

just hidden. And as long as we don't see

it, we don't think about it. це, ми не думаємо про це.

And he uses a good phrase to describe І він використовує гарну фразу для опису

this – out of sight, out of mind. And that's це – геть з очей, геть з розуму. І це

true, at least for me. My rubbish and правда, принаймні для мене. Моє сміття і

recycling is collected and I don't really переробка збирається, а я насправді ні

think about what happens to it after that. подумайте, що з ним станеться після цього.

Is as much of it recycled as I think, or is it Чи так багато його перероблено, як я думаю, чи так

buried, burned or even sent to other поховали, спалили або навіть відправили іншим

countries? It's not in front of my house, so країни? Значить, це не перед моїм будинком

I don't really think about it – out of sight, Я насправді не думаю про це - геть на виду,

out of mind. з розуму.

Let's listen again

Recycling is not the answer to waste from

an efficient point of view because we are ефективна точка зору, тому що ми

not able to get all the waste separated

properly and therefore treated in the належним чином і тому лікуються в

background. The main objective of our |||Ziel|| |||מטרה|| тло. Основна мета нашого

model is to hide waste so we don't see as

urban citizens, or rural citizens, we don't

see the waste, it is out of sight and побачити відходи, вони поза полем зору і

therefore out of mind. тому з глузду.

One possible solution to this problem is

to develop what is called a circular economy. ||||||zirkulären| ||||||מעגלית|

Here's the presenter of Business Daily, Ось ведучий Business Daily,

Manuela Saragosa, explaining what that means. Manuela Saragosa|Saragosa|||| מנואלה|סרגוסה||||

The idea then at the core of a circular

economic and business model is that a

product, like say a washing machine or продукт, наприклад, пральна машина або

even a broom, can always be returned to ||broom||||returned| ||מטאטא||||| навіть до мітли завжди можна повернутися

the manufacturer to be reused or repaired виробника для повторного використання або ремонту

before then sold on again. The point is

the manufacturer retains responsibility for ||behält|| ||keeps|| ||שומרת על|| виробник несе відповідальність за

the lifecycle of the product |Lebenszyklus||| |מחזור חיים|||

it produces rather than the consumer |||||הצרכן він виробляє, а не споживач

assuming that responsibility when he or בהנחה ש||||| беручи на себе цю відповідальність, коли він або

she buys it.

So it seems like a simple idea – though

maybe very difficult to do.

Yes, the idea is that the company that Так, ідея полягає в тому, що компанія, яка

makes a product, the manufacturer, is

responsible for the product, not the accountable||||| відповідає за продукт, а не за

person who bought it, the consumer. особа, яка його придбала, споживач.

So, if the product breaks or reaches the Отже, якщо виріб зламається або досягне

end of its useful life, its lifecycle, then the ||||||מחזור חיים||

manufacturer has to take it back and fix, виробник повинен забрати його назад і виправити,

refurbish or have it recycled. aufbereiten|||| odnowić|||| שפץ|||| відремонтувати або переробити.

I guess this would make manufacturers Я думаю, це зробили б виробники

try to make their products last longer! намагайтеся, щоб їхні вироби служили довше!

It certainly would. Let's listen again. Це, звичайно, буде. Давайте послухаємо ще раз.

The idea then at the core of a circular ||||||||מעגלי Тоді ця ідея була основою циркуляру

economic and business model is that a

product, like say a washing machine or продукт, наприклад, пральна машина або

even a broom, can always be returned to ||מטאטא||||| навіть до мітли завжди можна повернутися

the manufacturer to be reused or repaired

before then sold on again. The point is

the manufacturer retains responsibility for ||maintains|| ||שומרת על|| виробник несе відповідальність за

the lifecycle of the product it produces |מחזור חיי|||||

rather than the consumer assuming ||||מניח שהצר

that responsibility when he or she buys it.

That's just about all we have time for in Це майже все, на що ми маємо час

this programme. Before we recycle the

vocabulary…

Oh very good Neil!

Before we - thank you Sam - before we recycle Перш ніж ми - дякую Семе - перш ніж ми переробимо

the vocabulary, we need to get the answer словниковий запас, нам потрібно отримати відповідь

to today's question. Which country recycles

the highest percentage of its waste? Is it:

A: Sweden, B: Germany or C: New Zealand

Sam, what did you say?

I think it's Germany.

Well I would like to offer you congratulations

because Germany is the correct answer.

Now let's go over the vocabulary.

Of course. 'To separate' means to divide or

split different things, for example, розділити різні речі, наприклад,

separate your plastic from your paper for

recycling.

'Treating' is the word for dealing with, for

example, recycled waste. наприклад, перероблені відходи.

The phrase 'out of sight, out of mind',

means ignoring something or a situation |התעלמות מ||||

you can't see.

A 'manufacturer' is the person or company

that makes something and the consumer

is the person who buys that thing.

And the length of time you can expect a І тривалість часу, на який ви можете розраховувати a

product to work for is known as its 'lifecycle'. ||||||||מחזור חיים

Well the lifecycle of this programme is 6

minutes, and as we are there, or thereabouts, |||||||in der Nähe minutes||||||| |||||||בערך שם хвилин, і коли ми там, або близько того,

it's time for us to head off. Thanks for нам час вирушати. Дякую за

your company and hope you can join us вашу компанію та сподіваюся, що ви зможете приєднатися до нас

again soon. Until then, there is plenty скоро знову. До того часу є багато

more to enjoy from BBC Learning English

online, on social media and on our app.

Bye for now.

Bye!